<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Academic spat-watch 1: the war on Universal Grammar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.prospectblogs.com/2007/06/01/academic-spat-watch-1-the-war-on-universal-grammar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.prospectblogs.com/2007/06/01/academic-spat-watch-1-the-war-on-universal-grammar/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 01:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Academic spats revisited: one, two, many at First Drafts - The Prospect magazine blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.prospectblogs.com/2007/06/01/academic-spat-watch-1-the-war-on-universal-grammar/#comment-2251</link>
		<dc:creator>Academic spats revisited: one, two, many at First Drafts - The Prospect magazine blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 20:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.prospectblogs.com/2007/06/01/academic-spat-watch-1-the-war-on-universal-grammar/#comment-2251</guid>
		<description>[...] greater than two. And their language, as we&#8217;ve discussed in both the magazine and this blog, lies at the heart of a huge debate in modern linguistics, in which nothing less than Chomsky’s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] greater than two. And their language, as we&#8217;ve discussed in both the magazine and this blog, lies at the heart of a huge debate in modern linguistics, in which nothing less than Chomsky’s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
