26 Nov 07
Race wars
Just when you thought the dust was settling over the Jim Watson race/IQ affair, the row has re-erupted in the blogosphere, with William Saletan, Slate’s national correspondent, writing a series of articles defending the proposition that there are systematic and measurable differences in intelligence between the races, and that there is “strong evidence” that these is a genetic component to these differences. He’s been taken to task at Crooked Timber, among other places—Henry Farrell describes the “’scientists’” (scare quotes in the original) on whom Saletan relies to bolster his argument as “demonstrable charlatans and cranks.” It’s difficult to credit that a journalist as senior as Saletan would be as lazy with his research as some of his critics allege on a topic as flammable as this, but to these untutored eyes at least, he does seem to have rather been skewered.
A rather more minor race war recently erupted on this side of the Atlantic, when New Labour activist and blogger Alex Hilton made the spectacularly bad judgement that it would be a good idea to “out” the 22-year-old daughter of a Tory MP for having quoted, on her Facebook page, a (black) friend of hers using the term “nigga.” After the story reached the Standard, Hilton dug an ever deeper hole for himself with a article for the Guardian’s Comment is Free, which opened:
I’m half Indian; my father was a refugee from Uganda in the 1970s, but I look white to most people. Some people have told me that has given me a specific view of racism - like a black man looking out of a white man’s body.
The subsequent comments demonstrated a unanimity very rarely encountered in the CiF pigpen, and are well worth browsing through if you’re having a slow Monday. Hilton eventually caved in and issued a grudging apology on his blog, Recess Monkey.
free viagra
buy viagra online
generic viagra
how does viagra work
cheap viagra
buy viagra
buy viagra online inurl
viagra 6 free samples
viagra online
viagra for women
viagra side effects
female viagra
natural viagra
online viagra
cheapest viagra prices
herbal viagra
alternative to viagra
buy generic viagra
purchase viagra online
free viagra without prescription
viagra attorneys
free viagra samples before buying
buy generic viagra cheap
viagra uk
generic viagra online
try viagra for free
generic viagra from india
fda approves viagra
free viagra sample
what is better viagra or levitra
discount generic viagra online
viagra cialis levitra
viagra dosage
viagra cheap
viagra on line
best price for viagra
free sample pack of viagra
viagra generic
viagra without prescription
discount viagra
gay viagra
mail order viagra
viagra inurl
generic viagra online paypal
generic viagra overnight
generic viagra online pharmacy
generic viagra uk
buy cheap viagra online uk
suppliers of viagra
how long does viagra last
viagra sex
generic viagra soft tabs
generic viagra 100mg
buy viagra onli
generic viagra online without prescription
viagra energy drink
cheapest uk supplier viagra
viagra cialis
generic viagra safe
viagra professional
viagra sales
viagra free trial pack
viagra lawyers
over the counter viagra
best price for generic viagra
viagra jokes
buying viagra
viagra samples
viagra sample
cialis
generic cialis
cheapest cialis
buy cialis online
buying generic cialis
cialis for order
what are the side effects of cialis
buy generic cialis
what is the generic name for cialis
cheap cialis
cialis online
buy cialis
cialis side effects
how long does cialis last
cialis forum
cialis lawyer ohio
cialis attorneys
cialis attorney columbus
cialis injury lawyer ohio
cialis injury attorney ohio
cialis injury lawyer columbus
prices cialis
cialis lawyers
viagra cialis levitra
cialis lawyer columbus
online generic cialis
daily cialis
cialis injury attorney columbus
cialis attorney ohio
cialis cost
cialis professional
cialis super active
how does cialis work
what does cialis look like
cialis drug
viagra cialis
cialis to buy new zealand
cialis without prescription
free cialis
cialis soft tabs
discount cialis
cialis generic
generic cialis from india
cheap cialis sale online
cialis daily
cialis reviews
cialis generico
how can i take cialis
cheap cialis si
cialis vs viagra
levitra
generic levitra
levitra attorneys
what is better viagra or levitra
viagra cialis levitra
levitra side effects
buy levitra
levitra online
levitra dangers
how does levitra work
levitra lawyers
what is the difference between levitra and viagra
levitra versus viagra
which works better viagra or levitra
buy levitra and overnight shipping
levitra vs viagra
canidan pharmacies levitra
how long does levitra last
viagra cialis levitra
levitra acheter
comprare levitra
levitra ohne rezept
levitra 20mg
levitra senza ricetta
cheapest generic levitra
levitra compra
cheap levitra
levitra overnight
levitra generika
levitra kaufen




“Henry Farrell describes the “’scientists’” (scare quotes in the original) on whom Saletan relies to bolster his argument as “demonstrable charlatans and cranks.” It’s difficult to credit that a journalist as senior as Saletan would be as lazy with his research as some of his critics allege on a topic as flammable as this, but to these untutored eyes at least, he does seem to have rather been skewered.”
Henry Farrell is a moron. William Saletan describes a review paper by Arthur Jensen and JP Rushton.
Arthur Jensen is considered a leader in his field, if not the most important living figure in differential psychology. In one prominent study ranking the 100 most eminent psychologists of the 20th century he was placed number 47, right next to Stanley Milgram.
http://www.assessmentpsychology.com/eminentpsychologists.htm
To your untutored eyes does that sound like a “demonstrable charlatan/crank”? Does that sound like a source a journalist should hesitate from using? Jensen is the leading figure in human intelligence theory and research.
As for Rushton, he continues to publish his “pseudoscientific” research on race in numerous respected scientific journals, as his critics are seen to explicitly lament:
http://www.psychology.uoguelph.ca/faculty/winston/papers/rushton.html
Why do all these science journals continue to publish this “pseudoscientific” material from a “demonstrable crank”? Could it be they know more about what constitutes acceptable research? Nah, must be a racist conspiracy within science.