Michael Billington’s latest meditations on the Guardian arts blog merely underlines the case John Elsom made in this issue about British theatre’s left-wing blimps. Would Billington’s ‘concern’ for the future quality David Mamet’s work, after the dramatist’s self-declared swing to the right, have been quite so overwhelming if Mamet had instead confessed to joining the Socialist Worker’s Party?
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- jaime on Why Baby P died
- JohannessAndLihua on China: A bull in Congo’s shop
- Jacqueline on The Dubai Two
- Jacqueline on Psychogeography in Westfield
- Jacqueline on Race face-saving at the Met
- Motorcycle website marketing on Across Congo, on a motor bike
- Gabre on The Dubai Two
- Pavel Pelikan on Fixated on Friedman
- Noel Nesor on Bombings in the maximum city
- Noel Nesor on The Dubai Two
- Aniruddha G. Kulkarni on Bombings in the maximum city
- Robert Hanrott on Walker vs Haldenby on public sector reform in the crunch
- Dave B on The audacity of Dave
- Laura on China: A bull in Congo’s shop
- anderson on China: A bull in Congo’s shop
Blogroll
- 3quarksdaily
- British Psychological Society research digest
- Crooked Timber
- Finance & Economics
- Foreign Policy passport
- France Profonde
- Freakonomics blog
- Fugitive Peace—Gideon Lichfield
- Gauche—Paul Anderson
- Gideon Rachman
- Guido Fawkes
- Happiness and Public Policy
- Harry’s Place
- Marginal Revolution
- Normblog
- Oliver Kamm
- Overcoming bias
- Political Betting
- Pootergeek
- Potlatch—William Davies
- Prospect magazine homepage
- The Economist—Free Exchange
- The Guardian Comment is Free
- The Spectator—Coffee House
- The Times—Comment central
- The Virtual Stoa

0 Response to “Left-wing blimps, act II”